Please... no more... |
Since Frozen was
out all I kept hearing from friends was how Olaf, this goofy-looking snowman
character, was not as “annoying as I thought he’d be”. Once I finally decided
to give the film a chance, I wondered “What if I actually wind up liking Olaf?”
Spoilers: It didn’t happen. Here’s why.
Nothing pisses me off more than comedic relief characters.
Characters that serve no other purpose other than to bounce around the screen
making humorless jokes. Characters that could simply be written out of the script
and nothing would change. Throughout the movie I was thinking to myself just
how much these scenes would’ve been impacted had Olaf not been written into the script, and here’s the thing – I got nothing.
Literally nothing would’ve changed,
save for the removal of an obnoxious musical number and maybe a scene towards
the end that could’ve been easily altered without his presence.
Frozen is hardly the first culprit to this crime, and definitely not going to be the last. It’s a reoccurring theme in a lot of animated movies, and even live action ones. I don’t know a single soul who would lament the absence of Jar Jar from the Star Wars prequels or Ruby Rhod from The Fifth Element – characters whose screentime practically render my viewing experience into a miserable depth of self-loathing when I realize there had been a thought and storyboarding process that went into the creation of them. That people paid an actor to wail into a soundbooth or flap about in front of a camera to say stupid lines and do stupid things for the amount of money I could probably buy a house with. It makes me want to sit the writers down and introduce them to this really novel concept.
Comedic relief
characters don’t need to exist.
That’s it. You really don’t need them. Even my experience
with Frozen had earned some chuckles, and
none of them from Olaf – but mostly Kristoff,
this dude who sells ice. I liked him! Despite hating the movie
more than I did, my roommates even have a Kristoff doll in our living room, and
after seeing the whole bloody affair I can finally see why! I also enjoyed the tête-à-tête
between the two main characters. It was really the only thing I can say I
thoroughly had fun with.
"Comedic Relief" - probably the best thing to happen since herpes! |
So here’s the skinny, and I’ll say it again: Comedic relief
characters don’t need to exist, because you can write funny jokes with your main
characters. Shocking, I know. Who would’ve thought you could have a witty
protagonist and still have drama happen
to them? They can still take things seriously when things need to be serious,
and crack a joke to keep the tone light.
Having rewatched How
To Train Your Dragon recently, I realized how flawlessly DreamWorks pulled
off a balance of wit and drama. Hiccup is a perfect example that you
can have a hero who can be funny and still
save the day – because he’s written like a normal person (which is ironic
considering the time period, but you don’t exactly refer to a kid’s movie for
historical accuracy). Even the characters you could arguably consider “comedic
relief” do serve a purpose in the climax of the movie, and aren’t just ugly
props of bad jokes. What more, it’s still entertaining for both children as
well as adults. I could seriously go on about how ideal How To Train Your Dragon compared to Frozen is, but I digress.
Whether you’re writing a story, a comic, or even a movie script,
I think all writers should reevaluate the importance of a character, especially
if they’re just there to dish out “humor” and nothing else. Basically, if they’re
not important to the story but to serve as a distraction to your audience and script, you probably need to consider how your main characters are written.
Because you can just as easily put a balance of the two into one character without
having to toss in an insufferable stereotype whose only function is to burn
screentime that could go into serving more well-rounded, more interesting characters.
No comments:
Post a Comment